Home Updates (12/28) Newsletter MySpace Search Contact About

Profiles | Reasons | FAQs
Timeline of Events
The Aftermath
Hoaxes & Myths
Case Documents
Greenhouse Diagram
Dead Men Don't Pull Triggers
Audio & Video
Unanswered Questions
Theory Rebuttals
Other Sites
 

Love & Death
Books
Television
Radio
Kurt & Courtney
Magazines
Newspapers
Internet
 

Murdering Kurt Cobain
The Rome Incident
Kurt Was Not Suicidal
Eldon Hoke / El Duce
Heavier Than Heaven?
Handwriting Analysis
Kristen Pfaff (4/25)
 

Letter Campaigns
Instant Websites
Web Banners
Stickers & Buttons
Make A T-Shirt
Send An eCard
 

About Nirvana
Downloads

In the spirit of fairness, here are rebuttals and debates about the murder theories. Consider all the information presented on this site as a movement for the truth, not a trash-Courtney free-for-all.

  • Justice For Kurt if he was murdered, in terms of helping expose Tom Grant's information and getting everything out there.

  • Justice For Kurt if he really did end his own life, in terms of helping to rid his name and legacy of all these murder theories for good.


    ANOTHER LOOK AT THE "FACTS" OF THE MURDER THEORIES (new)
    By A Forum Member
    ANALYSIS OF THE "FACTS" IN THE COBAIN MURDER THEORY
    By Charles Rollins

    THE DEAD MEN DON'T PULL TRIGGERS DEBATE
    Roger Lewis vs. Bradley Speers

    Robert Lewis, a Canadian chemist, wrote a very detailed essay in on the massive blood morphine level found in Cobain's body. His findings claim that Cobain was either incapacitated or dead before the gunshot, and that he was a victim of homicide, not suicide. That essay is archived on this site.
    http://www.justiceforkurt.com/investigation/dmdpt/

    It can also be found on his website.
    http://www.globalserve.net/~artnet/dmdpt97f.html

    Bradley Speers. a pharmacology student, wrote a rebuttal to Lewis' essay, entitled Rebuttal to Dead Men Don't Pull Triggers. Speers says "My rebuttal would not disprove claims provided by the essay, and the essay does seem to have interesting points, but you should be weary of a few things."
    http://www.curmudgeon.fl.net.au/rebuttal.htm

    Roger Lewis then wrote a response to Bradley Speers' rebuttal. That response was also posted on his website for everyone to read.
    http://www.globalserve.net/~artnet/speers.html

    It's an interesting debate, detailing some complicated science between two people who seem very skilled in the science of drugs. Perhaps more importantly, it was a mature debate between two people that respected each others opinions.

  • Search Trackback Tech Help Privacy Policy Thanks